<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will this change Mobile advertising?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasingthestorm.com/will-this-change-mobile-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasingthestorm.com/will-this-change-mobile-advertising/</link>
	<description>Original content, Real opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isman Tanuri</title>
		<link>http://chasingthestorm.com/will-this-change-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>Isman Tanuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingthestorm.com/?p=2004#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>Never an Apple fan (except for their marketing dept) or much for advertising either, but when I saw the iAd video at Mobile Marketing Forum last week, I am very convinced of the genius behind Apple. What is the differentiator?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you have highlighted, Shalabh: Content, Utility and Platform! Although I&#039;ve seen the Admob version of such offerings [hence the Google buy, I believe], it remains to be seen whether they can pinch ahead on the platform front. As much as I love Android, it is so fractionalised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Apple is offering is pretty much an &#039;ad app within an app&#039;. But it would most probably be the most seamless and &#039;less-irritating&#039; brand push experience you can find around. Not to mention the wealth of brand-related content and utility that will bring users back again. I personally feel that is the ideal approach for brands on the mobile platform. &#039;Do not be an irritant&#039;. The mobile device is possibly the most intimate touchy-feely moment a man can have with an electronic gadget. Unless it&#039;s an MRI machine or a shaver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last note: Die SMS ads. The most disruptive and interruptive form of advertising I can think of (but it is high worth industry apparently).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never an Apple fan (except for their marketing dept) or much for advertising either, but when I saw the iAd video at Mobile Marketing Forum last week, I am very convinced of the genius behind Apple. What is the differentiator?</p>
<p>As you have highlighted, Shalabh: Content, Utility and Platform! Although I&#39;ve seen the Admob version of such offerings [hence the Google buy, I believe], it remains to be seen whether they can pinch ahead on the platform front. As much as I love Android, it is so fractionalised.</p>
<p>What Apple is offering is pretty much an &#39;ad app within an app&#39;. But it would most probably be the most seamless and &#39;less-irritating&#39; brand push experience you can find around. Not to mention the wealth of brand-related content and utility that will bring users back again. I personally feel that is the ideal approach for brands on the mobile platform. &#39;Do not be an irritant&#39;. The mobile device is possibly the most intimate touchy-feely moment a man can have with an electronic gadget. Unless it&#39;s an MRI machine or a shaver.</p>
<p>Last note: Die SMS ads. The most disruptive and interruptive form of advertising I can think of (but it is high worth industry apparently).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isman Tanuri</title>
		<link>http://chasingthestorm.com/will-this-change-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Isman Tanuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingthestorm.com/?p=2004#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>Never an Apple fan (except for their marketing dept) or much for advertising either, but when I saw the iAd video at Mobile Marketing Forum last week, I am very convinced of the genius behind Apple. What is the differentiator?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you have highlighted, Shalabh: Content, Utility and Platform! Although I&#039;ve seen the Admob version of such offerings [hence the Google buy, I believe], it remains to be seen whether they can pinch ahead on the platform front. As much as I love Android, it is so fractionalised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Apple is offering is pretty much an &#039;ad app within an app&#039;. But it would most probably be the most seamless and &#039;less-irritating&#039; brand push experience you can find around. Not to mention the wealth of brand-related content and utility that will bring users back again. I personally feel that is the ideal approach for brands on the mobile platform. &#039;Do not be an irritant&#039;. The mobile device is possibly the most intimate touchy-feely moment a man can have with an electronic gadget. Unless it&#039;s an MRI machine or a shaver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last note: Die SMS ads. The most disruptive and interruptive form of advertising I can think of (but it is high worth industry apparently).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never an Apple fan (except for their marketing dept) or much for advertising either, but when I saw the iAd video at Mobile Marketing Forum last week, I am very convinced of the genius behind Apple. What is the differentiator?</p>
<p>As you have highlighted, Shalabh: Content, Utility and Platform! Although I&#39;ve seen the Admob version of such offerings [hence the Google buy, I believe], it remains to be seen whether they can pinch ahead on the platform front. As much as I love Android, it is so fractionalised.</p>
<p>What Apple is offering is pretty much an &#39;ad app within an app&#39;. But it would most probably be the most seamless and &#39;less-irritating&#39; brand push experience you can find around. Not to mention the wealth of brand-related content and utility that will bring users back again. I personally feel that is the ideal approach for brands on the mobile platform. &#39;Do not be an irritant&#39;. The mobile device is possibly the most intimate touchy-feely moment a man can have with an electronic gadget. Unless it&#39;s an MRI machine or a shaver.</p>
<p>Last note: Die SMS ads. The most disruptive and interruptive form of advertising I can think of (but it is high worth industry apparently).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

