texas car title and payday loan houston tx
no credit check loans same day deposi
really poor credit payday loans
bk loans online
lloyds tsb internet loans
dr payday loan store on capital
title loans yuba city
national cash advance euclid ohio
ace payday loans faq
ly 2000 loan with monthly payment
cash advance loans in murfreesboro tn
cheap bank loan
il payday loans bloomington il
unsecured personal loans online instant decision
quicken loans relocation
payday advance loans costa m
payday loan statute of limitations
payday loan consolidation companie
quick cash in greenville ms
cash advance jesup ga
cash converters cash advance nz
wells fargo platinum visa cash advance fee
tn payday loans rogersville tn
direct loans economic hardship deferment request 2011
ns how to get a loan to pay off payday lo
wi payday loans in madison wiscon
are payday loans legal in 1
cash money loan
payday loans w
online payday loans for texas
low rates loan
your payday loan help scam
direct payday lenders with no fees
instant loans guaranteed acceptance
quicken loans chase building
payday loans fort wayne indi
payday loan tv commercial
payday loans that require no checking account
fl payday loans east grand forks
payday loans eugene oregon
how do you apply for a loan online
loans for beginning farmer
ace cash express almeda houston
payday loans preston hwy louisville ky
loan companies palmer with no credit chec
rs poor credit payday loans direct lender
low interest college loans parents
definition of short term loan
ns payday loans with no credit check charleston
illegal online payday loan companies in alabama
how to avail cash advance in eastwest credit card
payday loans massillon oh
how to make quick cash onlin
flm quick loans payday loan
can you have more than one payday loan at a time in illin
an old payday loan d
first cash direc
cash advance zero interest credit cards
delaware title loans elsmere
cheap loans u
payday nutrition
payday loans inman sc
alpine direct services llc payday loans
cash advance loans with no job
direct loan student consolidation
short term loans dayton ohio
texas payday loan disclosure
an first novus payday loans
payday loans easton md
er bridge payday loan revi
payday loans newnan ga
cash loan now pay later
payday loans staples mill rd richmond va
payday loans regulatory reform
an bond loans
fast payday loans 10
payday loan store appleton wi
need cash fast loan
ns banks offering unsecured loans
help payday loan
allied cash advance in hesperia ca
ameritrust cash advance cleveland tn
check cash advance
instant cash loans u
how does loan wor
fast cash loan online in the philippines
loan financing calculato
payday loans east peoria il
loans by text uk lenders
payday loans annapolis md
ace cash express careers texas
good payday loans reviews
ne payday loans direct loan company
an i can99999t find a payday l
long term loan no credit chec
personal loan rates california
ut payday loans no fee same day pay
line of credit loan onlin
santander cash advance fee visa debit
payday loan stores melbourne
Home » Advertising, social media, web 2.0

Facebook and Twitter: Which is Best for Business?

6 May 2013 No Comment

Facebook and Twitter have both become integral parts of many web users’ digital lives, whether they are accessed on the best ultrabook or the humble office PC, or even on smartphones and tablets. Consequently, both social media sites are also vital in a business context, offering companies the opportunity to reach millions of potential customers. Each however has particular strengths and weaknesses, and therefore needs to be used differently to help generate profits.

A straight numbers comparison between Facebook and Twitter has obvious flaws, the chief one being that, while the two are competing for users’ attention, they are not direct rivals offering the same service. Most notably, Twitter allows users and brands to instantly self-publish to the world, while Facebook is mostly intended to be an extension of real life social networks, and posts are therefore generally limited to friends or fans. Nevertheless, it is useful to have a quick look at a few statistics that give a broad overview of the two social media services. First, the big one, number of users. Well, in October 2012, Facebook announced that it now had over one billion users registered and using the site monthly, and over 600 million active daily users. In comparison, Twitter has approximately 500 million registered users, but only 140 million active users, according to data published on The Social Skinny.

Facebook is then the clear behemoth of the two, and the definite market leader in the social media space. It therefore offers a compelling opportunity to advertisers, who can not only access over a billion potential customers, but also target their ads in ways that simply weren’t possible previously, based on the information in users’ Facebook profiles. If you want to reach all 18-25 year olds living in Los Angeles, you can. Likewise, if you want to target all female Glee fans living in the US, you can do that too. In fact, any ad’s reach can be customised according to location, gender, age, and interests to ensure that you are only contacting potential customers.

If Facebook is the market leader then, Twitter is a niche, but it is has some of the typical advantages of a niche, including a certain cache of exclusivity and greater level of commitment to the medium from its smaller user base. And then there’s its biggest advantage, Twitter is a real-time communication medium in ways that Facebook simply isn’t and cannot be. As noted in an article on CNBC, the Super Bowl blackout illustrated this perfectly, the event having an instant impact on Twitter and generating 231,500 tweets. Advertisers reacted just as quickly, with the first promoted tweet appearing in Super Bowl blackout searches within four minutes of the event.

There are also indications that Twitter is simply better suited to corporate use than Facebook – perhaps because while people follow their friends on Facebook, they generally follow companies and famous individuals on Twitter, ensuring they expect and perhaps even hope for tweets regarding special offers, sales, discounts and new product launches, information that on Facebook would seem like an intrusion into what is essentially a personal sphere of communication. This view is backed up by data from the Digital Surgeons website that shows that while 51 percent of Facebook brand followers will purchase that specific brand, for Twitter, this figure is 67 percent, indicating a significantly greater level of customer engagement.

Facebook then is great for what might be termed “background advertising”, the sort of advertising that we now accept as the constant background to our digital lives and that can be meaningful if done in an interesting and thought provoking way. The ability to target users is vital for many advertisers, and the site’s enormous reach is undeniable. For those companies who want to make an instant impact though, Twitter may be the way to go.

 

 

Guest writing/external sources