One of the most misunderstood and favorite punching bag of all. Online Display advertising. Also mistakenly called “Banner advertising”.

Mistakenly because there’s more to display advertising than banner advertising. Why, there is more to Banner advertising than just “banner” advertising-but more on that later.

Display media, as it matures, is undergoing multiple transitions. It still commands majority of media ad dollars though sources claim- at declining growth rates. But this will soon change, as metrics related to brand awareness/positive predisposition attribution, and advertising’s role in defining a holistic web strategy evolves.

Till then, digital display advertising is ridden with demand generation implications. Banners are a commodity- and there is a reason why ad networks are making the hay while the sun shines.

There are undue pressures on Banner advertising, and because it is treated like a commodity, there is always a price ‘push back’ phenomenon- buy cheaper for better conversion attribution and RoI.

And largely because of this, a whole ‘big scale’ cottage industry now thrives to  make Display advertising more accountable for conversions.

The landscape below:

Look at tools that provide ‘Data Optimization’, ‘yield optimization’ and ‘Creative optimization’.
Ad exchanges, networks and performance networks (another variety of ad networks) are thriving and mushrooming- and that is a good thing as well as a not so good thing.

While I discuss that at another time, what is important to note is how the Digital media planner’s skill set changes due to the introduction of these new variables and tools in media planning.

Think about it
Shalabh

One thing I feel disenchanted about in Asia, is the fact that there is more “talking the talk” than “walking the talk” – when it comes to encouraging the start-up ecosystem.

Like many other things in life, people look at the West, marvel about how good the start up environment is (can the real slim shady please step up and explain- Silicon Valley is not ‘the West’). But when  it comes to supporting the start up ecosystem, hardly any one seems to put the money where their mouth is.

This seems to be true even in countries like Singapore, with a focus to foster entrepreneurship. There are loads of institutions for start up mentoring and support, but when it comes to seed stage or idea stage funding, there is more talk, than play. Many of these incubation institutions seem to be self serving tools for their founders (“I am a ‘mentor’/father figure for start ups”) than making any tangible real difference to start ups. 

Businesses need more than a garage and some computers to start with- though that makes for a nice story.  For a 50k grant, the expectation is that entrepreneurs will not have any earning and work full time to bring a product out in the market. Which is the reason why you see school/college kids starting up operations rather than serious, mature individuals. (and by that, I don’t mean grandpa). The ones who eventually do get something out of this, will probably be experienced individuals in the game of funding and ‘well connected’.

Most funding institutions have limited sight, angel investment is a rare thing, venture capital looks for (perceived) risk free/me-too projects (Online travel operator? tick. Online book selling company? tick. Online ad network? tick. Mobile ad network? double tick- because “you know AdMob got acquired by Google”) -you got the idea.

Yes there are incubation/funding institutions, but the truth is, it is too little with too much effort (to get at it- not the effort to make a successful company). Add the red tape (wait for 5 months for a 50k grant and still not be sure where you are)- and you are set for disappointment. (happened to some people I know).

This space has more action in words than deed.

Prove me wrong and I’ll dance with you.

In my about to be launched book- “Think About It”- Ideas shaping digital media and marketing in the new decade, I discuss something that is just one step behind Augmented Reality, and if used correctly, could really boost interactive marketing processes and adoption.

I have also mentioned in the past, that Augmented Reality is cool- though a technoolgy whose time was not there yet. I saw its adoption increasing from mid 2010 onwards- specifically in Asia.

AR is used across touchpoints now- like with printed codes, webcams and computers but to me the real coming of age would be interactive usability via camera enables mobile devices.

However, I see signs of Augmented Reality coming up faster than expected- with usage that is more practical than just ‘cool’.

Though when you see advertisers like Nike and Adidas using this technology, the ‘cool’ automatically associates.

I discuss some good campaigns around AR here:

Nike (via marketing interactive): This one is from Asia- Hong Kong.

Nike launched this programme (mcCann+hyperfactory) to target teenagers- for strengthening its soccer products.

For four weeks, Nike plastered a series of secret codes around Hong Kong, in Nike stores and at the Causeway Bay MTR station.

The codes invite users to download a mobile application that allows them to view its T90 soccer boots and ball in 3D through their mobile screens.

So this is simple- but an early entry into this market- makes it newsworthy and upholds the innovative/cool factor of Nike.

There are some other campaigns as listed bby Devora Rogers on iMediaconnection

Samsung:

This is a simple, yet great use of Augmented reality and we could see more such stuff in the near future.

Samsung’s AR execution, which helps consumers figure out what a TV will look like on the wall, before they hang it. Users print out an image that they then show to their webcam, which faces the wall on which they want to hang the TV. The screen recognizes the AR trigger, and instead of seeing the printout, users see a TV laid over their wall through their screen.

With these examples, this technology seems perfectly well suited for home improvement and decoration industries- but the potential goes much further than that.

Home Depot:

This US retail giant has reinvented the humble gift cards.

Simply put, when you receive a gift card, displaying it in front of a webcam enables users to browse and buy products online or plan for their next project.

Here’s more- in video:

Ray Ban:

Another really cool yet practical usage by Ray Ban.

Rayban Virtual Mirror application demonstration. Using key points on your face the app maps pairs of augmented reality shades onto your face. Then you can click straight through to the store.

Ordinary people:

Well you could use this on your resume or on your business cards. Imagination is the only limitation here. Of course being a bit flamboyant helps

The real coming of age of this technology will be when it is more end user focused rather than being inward focused.

Think About It

Shalabh

“Think About It”- Ideas shaping digital media and marketing in the new decade

Its love’s labour. Really.

After more than a year of running ChasingTheStorm – with loads of loving time spent- and acquiring loads of loving friend circle, this is it. I put together a book.

“Think About It” is a book inspired by Ideas from this website. With more meat, more thoughts and well, in a different format. The title of the book is actually the signature I use in most articles.

The book covers Digital Media and Marketing trends in the new decade, Mobile Media, new marketing paradigms and Marketing Case studies.

It is written not as a tutorial to digital media platforms or Digital marketing 101. Rather- it attempts to raise a storm on specific Digital media issues. Offering an easy read for the evolved, thinking marketer, it is a book to raise debate- and expects a degree of interest in Digital Media.

I’ll talk more about it later- but since I am quite excited about it, I decided to put up the news anyways.

It’ll go in print soon (and available online and on the Kindle)- but as usual, not without your support in its making. I need you to help pick up the right cover design.

My good friend Ankur Khurana volunteered to get the cover design done- and boy- he did get them designed in two days flat. Many thanks buddy. And many thanks to MG Harti- the Art Director who helped the idea come into reality by doing many iterations.

So here are the designs- (the copy/text and some elements are dummy).

Just from a design layout perspective- let me know which ones do you like the best?

You could comment here, or

Email me: shalabhpandey at gmail dotcom

DM or @ at Twitter : @shalabhpandey

The cover Designs for “Think About It”

GROUP 1:

Cover One

Cover 2

Cover 3

Cover 4

GROUP 2:

Cover 5

Cover 6

Cover 7

Cover 8

Comment here, or

Email me: shalabhpandey at gmail dotcom

DM or @ at Twitter : @shalabhpandey

Think About It

Shalabh

Think of some oxymorons. And then think about this- “templatized entrepreneurship”.

In case you are actively looking for starting your own (tech/web) venture- and looking for any kind of assistance- financial or otherwise- be prepared for these templatized requirements from establishments:

Template 1) Single entrepreneurs are not welcome.Entrepreneurship support/financing companies are of the belief system that starting business is something that necessarily needs more than one founders.

This started from the hotbed of all such activities- Silicon Valley. Their Asian counterparts- as expected- take the template apply here. But is this requirement true of startup success /entrepreneurship all over the world? Is the culture in Asia more individual led than partnerships led?

This presentation from TED India descibes some nuances in the different value structures between the East and the West:

Template 2) If you are tech start up- not only do you need multiple partners, at least one of them has to be ‘Technology’ background.

Template 3) The younger you are, the more schemes there are for you. Age is inversely proportional to the chances of getting funding- and is directly proportional to the demands from the prospective venture

Template 4) Don’t get your spouse involved in the business. An incompetent partner is more welcome that a competent spouse. No body wants a Mom and pop show.

Template 5) A bad idea that everyone else is doing- is more valuable than a ‘good’ concept that no one is pursuing.

So in case you are looking for funding- follow these templates. And remember- it is always more important to spend your time in contests, shows and funding presentations.The work on business can wait- get the glamor on first.

Think about it

Shalabh

Welcome to 2010. The year when Social Networks get into early adulthood- and get married. To whom? The real world. FTW for sure. And sure enough- the best man will be the mobile device.

I don’t say this to promote Augmented reality. That I’ve already discounted. No- not given up (I think it is pretty cool) just time shifted- not for the next 6 months in 2010.

Why do I say so? Listen up:

• Facebook has more than 65 million members accessing it using mobile.
• 20 percent of Twitter streams originate from mobile devices
• In 2009, YouTube video watching through mobiles was up 52 percent-  according to a study published in May by Nielsen.

These three social networks- pretty much rule the web world- and they are slowly but surely being mobility driven. Mobile is the BFF of Social Networking. But there’s one marriage that is long being awaited. That between the real and the virtual world. Tying the knot between real life interaction and virtual (mobile +web) presence.

In late 2007, while being on a panel at GSMA in Macau, one of the things I had felt and brought up was that location awareness could give a great boost to mobile marketing. Though many marketers did not have a great degree of success at the time (with limited bluetooth and SMS campaigns), I always had this hunch that the one obvious advantage of mobile over others is – ahem-mobility. And we finally see it happening now- with the convergence of Social and real life (location) and Mobile.

While Twitter plans to incorporate location based features soon; applications like Google Latitude and Loopt are already in this direction. The ability to connect with ‘friends’ based on location hyper targeting coupled with other triggers is a ‘no- brainer’ path that will be taken soon by many others.

Marketing dollars will aid the growth of such services- we the marketers are hungry for these things. Forever. Ah! The pain of dealing with yet another technology and yet another platform.

See again- I said ‘marketing’ and not just ‘advertising’. Though advertising is the obvious beneficiary as well.

Ad Networks like AdMob are already cashing in to the opportunity (and I don’t mean the Google way) by offering location based ads.

But speaking of marketing, services like Foursquare have been making waves (and I promise you the buzz around this service will almost be as much as Twitter had from 2007-2009 the next year onwards).

Of course you know Foursquare- don’t you? a location-aware app that lets users “check in” at venues in a number of cities. The opportunities for footfalls are immense. You could do coupons (opt-ins of course) to subscribers within a certain radius of a location (say restaurant or boutique); or you could run loyalty rewards for frequent patrons (called Mayors for some funny reason)

Foursquare is not alone. I struggle to find Asian examples (trust me they will pop up within a month or two of this post) but there are other popular ones like Rummble (an interesting story of already brewing competition here) and Gowalla.

Rummble

Gowalla

Update on 7th feb 2010:

Just received a mail from Placepop about their offering too. In case you want to take them for a spin- you could try them free at the iTunes store

This is of course, not all. And there are at least a few solid Asian examples after all.

We saw Friendster acquisition by MoL, a company that will probably use the social network’s remaining audience base to promote m-commerce, micropayment led social gaming and what not.

Alongside, in October 2009, mobile manufacturer Ericsson tied up with Kaixin001. The deal was to incorporate more social activities to the handset and ease of access.

All said and done- Mr Real World- it is time to say “I do” to Lady Social Network. The best man “Mr Mobile” will keep a close watch.

In part 4 of this 4 part video brainstorm, we discuss how to market a start up.

Start ups usually do not have the luxury of huge advertising spends- and this pushed the boundaries being creative and using only the most efficient mediums for maximum bang for their buck.

Thorben highlights how he uses the Influencers (what I call the MicroInfluencers) to gain traction.

I had lots to discuss- but this was about them- and some good points were made .

Enjoy

Shalabh

In part 1 and part 2 of this 4 series video brainstorm, we discussed Orsiso and Advertising on social networks previously.

In Part3, we discuss whether downloadable appplications have a significant advantage over browser based or web based applications. Also another point- the funding story- the issues- what do investors look for, and the like.

In part 1 and part 2 of this 4 series video brainstorm, we discussed Orsiso and Advertising on social networks previously.

In Part3, we discuss whether downloadable appplications have a significant advantage over browser based or web based applications. Also another point- the funding story- the issues- what do investors look for, and the like.

Enjoy

Shalabh Pandey

We featured Orsiso in Part 1.

In part 2 of the discussion between myself (Shalabh Pandey) and Thorben, amongst other things, we discuss advertising on social networks, its significance and nuances.

Enjoy!

I was on a panel at the Social Networking World Forum Asia  held in Singapore recently.

Posting the audio podcast here- will soon follow it up with the video version.

In case the above player does not work for you- here is the direct link to the audio to play online or download to your players: Shalabh Pandey at Social Networking World Forum Asia

The Panel’s topic was

Home entertainment, broadcast television and social media

and the topics covered were:

• The marriage of online video and social media
• How communities can help develop better TV programming
• Using social networks to engage new audiences and expand reach
• Integrating social media within the Television proposition
• Developing pay-tv with web 2.0 applications.

Panelists:

Thorben: CEO Orsiso

Nicolas Colinos, Deputy Sales Director, Eurosport Asia

Shalabh Pandey, Digital Marketing Thinker and Strategist, Singapore

Chaired by Euan Wilcox from The Upper Story (Who did a great job in steering conversations)

The premise or build up was thus:

Premium content and advertising is fast becoming a key strategy allowing social networks to monetize their sites. Viral content distribution has created a valuable new inventory for advertisers and a new business model for the entire media industry.

We look at at content services, the strategy behind there delivery and how this can be developed.

In the audio clip, podcast and video, I have basically cut down the talk to my opinions – so apologies to the rest of the panel members- I will take the first opportunity to upload entire content (runs into 3 GB+ and it is a pain- so had to cut down)

Think about it

Shalabh

Whew!

We did this about a fortnight ago. A (apprx) 40 minute discussion caught on video- on Start ups, funding story and advertising on Social media- amongst many other things. Between me (Shalabh Pandey) and the CEO and co-founder of Orsiso- Thorben Linneberg.

I finally managed to clean up the video and uploaded the final video brainstorm- after about 2 weeks of having shot it.

Featuring the entire series in 4 parts- so enjoy this over the next few posts.

Part 1 of 4:

This is our first time doing a video- and the quality is a bit low. The video was on analgue tape- and I had only Windows Movie Maker- to help me with the editing. There was a time lag between the video and the audio- which was proving impossible to curate in WMM. And hence the quality is still not up to my satisfaction, but after having spent close to 25 hours or more on this- I thought I’d better get this up and running now.

The problem with me is I cannot compromise on quality of end product- and that pushes me to do as much as is within the outer boundaries of my limits.

But I believe web video is the future- and there are learnings for the next time.

• One learning has been that even though you can manage without the best equipment and software- it is not advisable to do so. You end up spending too much time and effort just cleaning the whole thing up.
• Another learning for me has been- in the absence of external mikes, speak up! My voice is a bit soft, and I also have a bit of a hunch- and since video is about presentation, it shows. Tip to remember next time.

Overall, it went off well- we had some help too- from Orsiso’s side- we had Laurent Roux- Business Director- helping co-ordinate- and from ChasingTheStorm we had some great help from Mohd Hisham with the camera set up.

The objective was to introduce Orsiso and alongside also have a little discussion session around the Web landscape of today.

In the first section, we discuss largely about Orsiso- how it aggregates various social networks and organizes your social life on the internet.

In the second section, we move on to discussing advertising and social networks

In the third section- we discuss whether downloadable applications are back or the browser based applications?

And in the last section, we discuss How to market a start up- basis Orsiso’s experience.

Enjoy!

Shalabh

Who will fuel the next wave of the growth of the Digital Media? Or more specifically- the Internet?

In an earlier post, I wondered if the new phase would still be fuelled by the Internet biggies. I also wondered if many small players are hugely susceptible to the might of the big guys. After all, the Internet biggies have been known to ‘eat up’ or acquire smaller promising companies.

Specially if you are a small player getting into their turf- they either acquire you, or (attempt to) kill you.

In this post, I turn the things a bit around. And argue in favor of these smaller companies.

To start with- there are signs that many big internet firms are precariously going the route of being “just another internet company”.

Or maybe these guys restart their growth story- with tremendous resources at their disposal. Only god knows!

Whatever it is, these are formidable forces. They fueled the growth of the Internet in the late 90s and 2000s- and grew exponentially in the range of product they owned- most of the times by the virtue of inorganic expansions.

You know them- the Googles, the Yahoos, the Amazons, the MSNs and the ebays.

The big question to be asked then is – are they able to play the same role in today’s ‘World Wide Web’ ecosystem as they have played over the last decade or so? With new players, new paradigms, escalating costs and cascading economies, what mantle are they going to wear?

Conglomerates by acquisition? Growth fuel-ers? Facilitators? Fence sitters? Or worse…hang on- there isn’t probably a “worse” than being ‘Fence Sitter’ for these guys.

If that scenario becomes a reality- these might be the possible causes:

Breakneck momentum and Survival of the fastest. Because anyone is giving a fight to everyone:
Vibes on the ground (and some in the stock market sentiments- where Apple has a market cap more than Google quite consistently now)- and yet some more in the virtual space- (with FaceBook and Twitter counting on conversation searches, and others like ‘bookmark search’ nibbling into their audience share etc) are indicators that in order to grow, Google and others might have to undergo another wave of serious innovation sooner than later.

It is not new to note that the big web brands have had various failures and limitations inspite of having deeper than deep coffers. Really.

Not only from the nimble small/independent companies that are causing disruption but competition is getting fiercer even within the biggies themselves.

It is a “Goliath against a David and another Goliath” match- where everyone is fighting everybody. Just like everywhere else. But this is the Internet. Battles here are fiercer- and shorter. These are the webDavids and the webGoliaths.

As an example of “Goliath against Goliath”, Apple is reportedly coming up with its own social network ( I can see the fanbois rejoicing)- with the threat of eating into audience attention span from Google properties & Microsoft and Yahoo eventually eating up search ad share.

And for the webDavids- I am surprised that so many nimble local map players have come up with such a variety of cool services, many ironically utilizing Google’s API. Apple’s iTunes is being challenged on its own turf- by small players launching competing apps for the iPhone!

Weak Products and weak marketing

The webDavids are slowly but surely gaining their footholds against the webGoliaths. They have not only been more nimble, with lesser cash burn rates, but in many cases even have also been able to develop great products- exploiting conspicuous gaps. (Twitter apparently had half of their earlier funds still in the bank when they received a fresh round of funding).

Also, for the webGoliaths, there have been surprising failures in the product development or product marketing front.

There are services not picking enough steam for the big players. Like VoIP forays by Google. It caused a bit of hype in the beginning and then died off. What was the unique disruption this service was causing? And why has is failed to retain the level of consumer interest?

And these are just web based business models – there are many forays by Google in print and radio that have proved quite disastrous (or ahead of their times). A case of trying too fast too soon.

Small does not mean- you can eat it

Traditionally, the big guys attempt to subvert smaller rivals by launching their own offerings against the smaller players. After all, big muscle means bigger market share right? Wrong.

PayPal-eBay: Ebay brought their own payment service to the market to kill payPal. It could not. PayPal became so popular, that eBay had to follow the philosophy of “If you can’t beat ‘em- BUY ‘em!”

Youtube-Google: Google had great reach and a repeat visitor base. YouTube was a baby. No match for the reach. Google Videos was launched- as  a me-too service at best at that point. Burnt some cash. And then ‘had to’ buy YouTube. Not bad. The small fish of yesterday- YouTube us the second most popular search engine on the Internet today.

There are many more examples- and I’m not even talking about the new Davids and Goliaths (Facebook trying to acquire Twitter- finally buying small FriendFeed, etc)

The never ending story continues. Grow big fast, subvert, kill.The mantras of survival in the internet ecosystem.

While everyone’s back to furious product development (igoogle social network, Google waves, Bing, conversation search, social shopping, etc) it is truly the survival of the fastest here.

Think about it.

Shalabh

(@shalabhpandey on twitter)

Sometimes my mind plays the Gemini tricks. Indecision. Yet sometimes I grant it the liberty to fly. Like when I am in one of those futuregazing whims.

Been observing the case of some niche services around Social Media offerings that have entered the market and got themselves flush with VC money. One cannot but wonder if they are riding the wave OR really have a solid ground OR are here for the taking (buyouts). Or worse, for the kill (low entry barriers by more established players).

Come to think of it. The web is becoming dangerously monopolistic. Or maybe cartel like. Or maybe we need to device a new term.

Where the big 5 or so players (across media/platform/services) take over anything with a probable potential. Like the lesser publicized acquisitions made by Amazon. Or in cases where they can’t, they decide to kill the infant in the cradle. By launching against their offerings with their own version- only with bigger and better resources.

Ironically, many a times, it might not be so evil as it sounds. Specially in cases where research has already been done, markets have already been explored and a solid product has already been delivered.

In such a scenario, if there is a new product in the market that sells due to package innovation, and makes money (and noise), there are obvious reasons (and lesser barriers) for the bigger brand to get a foot in that market’s door.

I talked about the lesser known case of Amazon acquisitions. Now take the more well known case of Google. Probably the most powerful force on the web- with its fingers in every pie and head in the rolling cheese.If it wanted, what are the new offerings it could eat up today- if it wanted to?

And Google is just an example. Though a strong contender to bulldoze through many niche and upcoming services, there are some services dangerously in Google terrain and so especially susceptible. I am listing three of those here.

Buzz monitoring/Social Conversations


• The PR folks have ruled and brought about the Web 2.o communications revolution, according to me. And they probably brought with them this entire idea that people are talking about brands in online various online forums. “If you could track down how many events for discussion around your brand are taking place- it would give you unprecedented tracking abilities”.
• Sure enough- many companies including traditional research agencies to web security agencies to nimble programming-business brains- sensed the opportunity and launched products that are being sold and used by many today.
• Companies- the likes of Google- have been delivering some of these services since ages.  Google has services like Alerts, news, Blog search, maps and local search, trends, insights and now the likes of Video insights. These products are free to use.
• So if there are free products, why would someone pay? The common contention for going to paid services is that they have less noise and could dig deep into forums etc- sections not indexed well by Google (or others) Other reasons listed here . Alongside others contend that the tools don’t matter, efforts do.
  

The question then is- how much does it take Google to scale up/package? It already has the reach and the infrastructure. Not to mention the products.

Sentiment tracking/Social conversation Search


• This is another differentiation by the niche service providers. While the likes of Google could provide instances, how would you know their relevance and context? Enter Sentiment tracking- where these companies identify positive or negative references in context of your brand
• How do they do that? Many ways- including ‘semantic’ methods to a mix of human-machine analysis.
• Again, the likes of Google have been doing this research for ages now. If they want to enter this space, will they hesitate?

Examples of both buzz/sentiment (and others like influencer tracking etc) are Radian6, Buzzmetrics/Nielsen Blogpulse, Techrigy, Samepoint, jamieQ, CC, Brandtology- just a few that are top of my mind


Enterprise Group Collaboration systems

• There has been a lot of talk around Social Media-tizing the organisation. Inspite of the fact that many group collaboration systems have been around since ages, like (Zoho or webex), the social media element was missing. Of course they are charged for, or at best freemium.
  
• So smart entrepreneurs grabbed a chance at it- and developed products that employees could use for better project management efficiencies (like Yammer, or SocialWok- a good Asian alternative) and where employees could co-ordinate via tweets 0r other popular social media tools

Google has been delivering some good products around the enterprise space. Their offerings on emails on custom domains etc have been quite successful. Similarly Yahoo with small biz solutions. Lately with the demonstrations of Google wave, it becomes clear that the likelihood of Google entering this space is not a remote concept to say the least.


Real time search

• This is where the big fight is. Though many smaller players are in the fray, the frenzy of the big guys is what makes this a different category
• Another reason that niche conversation tracking tout- real time search for “in time crisis management”- is where the big guys have already taken big steps

Facebook and Twitter are in the fray, with Google already working on some solutions in this area (Google Caffeine)

• This is the area where the fight is concentrated right now
• Latest developments like Facebook buying FriendFeed might have future impact in this domain
• On Facebook’s search capabilities, Mashable reports: While the new Facebook Search only launched this week, the new real-time search platform can search far more than status updates. With access to 250+ million users, the world’s largest social network can tap into photos, links, events, apps, and more for its new search engine.

Long post. I will try to highlight in the next post why historical evidence proves it might not be such a bad thing for the niche players.

Shalabh Pandey

(twitter.com/shalabhpandey)

Thumbnail courtsey : http://www.flickr.com/photos/stinkiepinkie_infinity/2658569216/sizes/m/

This is an event worth talking about: The Mobile Marketing Association is having a Conference in Singapore- its first one out of Asia.

“MMA Mobile Marketing Forum Asia (April 28 & 29, 2009 Singapore)”

Within Asia, I have attended some international events on this front- like GSMA in Macau- and other events on mobile marketing- some as a speaker. As far as I can remember, this is going to be a one of its kind event in Singapore.  Some details below:

To take an excerpt from their website- this is what the Association (and the conference) is all about:

The Mobile Marketing Association’s Mobile Marketing Forum series brings the entire mobile marketing ecosystem together under one roof. In partnership with Informa Telecoms & Media, the series brings together leading operators, brands, agencies, content providers, entertainment and media companies from around the globe to drive the momentum for mobile marketing adoption. The forums deliver the best learning and networking experience of any event in the mobile space, complete with fully interactive agendas packed with the latest brand, operator and agency case studies designed to give you the most value from your attendance. Those new to mobile will learn best practices with real-world application, and those already engaged in mobile can learn how to deploy more advanced capabilities to enhance existing mobile initiatives.

You will hear from industry thought leaders who really challenge existing thinking and drive initiatives; you can expect powerful debate and well-facilitated interaction; you will meet new partners and business connections; and you can expect to leave each event with new ideas and perspectives that will change the way you do business.

I am moderating a panel discussion with some eminent panelists. The topic was decided by me- and the thought being that we from the marketing industry really need to come together to understand what are the factors that impact the adaptation of mobile marketing by marketers and advertisers alike. We would also be trying to tackle some problems and brainstorming on the possible solutions or fixes- specially wrt Mobile Marketing in Asia. The panelists are experts and senior industry professionals who have their fingers on the pulse of the market- and it will be interesting to explore what’s on their minds.

The topic?

Ubiquitous and omni-functional- they say it is what computers have become. Then what is stopping mobile from becoming a mass adopted marketing medium?

The panelists and their brief professional summaries:

• Emmanuel Allix: Regional Technology Development Director, GroupM

Emmanuel joined GroupM Interaction (a WPP media investment company) in 2006 as their Regional Technology Development Director for Asia Pacific. In this position, he is currently overlooking GroupM Mobile Advertising activities for the whole Region and has been working with various Telcos and Brands in the Region to build the Mobile Advertising Asian ecosystem.

Emmanuel is also an APAC MMA Board Member and is a regular speaker at various events including CommunicAsia, Media360 and AdTech.
Prior to joining GroupM, Emmanuel spent more than 10 years in the IT and Internet arenas across Asia and Europe. He founded and run one of the first Internet Website development startups in France back in 1996, creating and launching several Websites and online activities for major French companies. He also led KPMG Consulting France E-Commerce Strategy group for a year and a half and worked on various assignments for Butagaz, Peugeot, Manutan, and National Ministry of Education. In 2001, he joined Singapore Airlines to head their E-Commerce initiatives for nearly 6 years.

• Ranjan Reddy Vice-President- Sales Arena Mobile (NeoMobile Group)
  

Ranjan R. Reddy drives Global Sales and Asia D2C at Arena Mobile (Part of NeoMobile Group) and has spent close to 5 years in the mobile industry across various operating functions. He is the driving force behind Arena Mobile’s foray into mobile marketing. He set up Arena Mobile’s India operations from scratch in 2006; rapidly but steadfastly expanding into a regional role. He has led the team in delivering a cent percent profitability from year one and establishing successful partnerships with globally recognized brands and agencies like Nokia, Diageo, Singapore Press Holdings, ICICI Bank, Publicis Group, Perfetti Van Melle to name a few.

As he spearheads Arena Mobile’s global sales force and strategy in his new role, with a keen eye on the D2C play in Asia, Ranjan loves an out of the box approach towards growing business in the traditional or an inorganic fashion. A keen observer of the strides of the digital space as it emerges today; he has done his Bachelor’s in Mass Media from Concordia College, Minnesota.”

• Ryan Lim Business Director, Blugrapes Pte Ltd.

“Ryan joined Blugrapes in August 2008. With a focus on developing new business he combines technical know how with his personal experience as a Marketing Manager for Lenovo and Microsoft. Ryan’s job history also includes three years as APAC Product Manager with Nokia. His expertise in mobile technology was nurtured here whilst managing applications and services.

While Ryan was with Lycos Asia shortly after graduation, he founded and managed Singapore’s largest gaming portal known as Khabal Gaming. An NUS graduate, with a BEng in Electrical Engineering, Ryan is also a husband and proud father to two young children. ”

• and Mansoor Siddiqi: Director of Integrated Marketing, Coca-Cola India

Now here’s the deal:

If you are interested, you can ask me a question here or on email (shalabhpandey at gmail) or twitter (@shalabhpandey)- and I’ll make sure- if it is worth it- to ask the panel on their opinion- with your mention. So do give me a short professional summary too. Following the panel discussion, I hope to do a round up on the blog as well- and will mention your name and bio as well.

Shalabh Pandey

The Earth Hour is approaching fast. On March 28th, 2009- at 8.30 PM everyone is implored to switch off their lights for an hour- no matter where they are.

Which is good. This was an opportune time for this post.

Now- I am a web proponent. Yes it is an almost cliched claim now. But have always been one.  A child of the dotcom era and stuck with it. I love it, evangelize, debate and make a noise about it. Using it for about 12 hours a day. Well, make that 14.

And what has that got to do with the Earth Hour?

Here’s the deal: the energy that goes in firing up your computers isn’t exactly zero carbon footprint. And actually the points that I will make- might as well give you a jolt without external power supply.

This is ironical people- most of the early adopters (of the internet and computers in general) are the guys that have a slant towards being more socially and environmentally conscious. And still there are some thing that escape us information overloaded “Don’t be evil” folks.

With the rise in “Internet Sociability” – people are relying more and more on the web – Search, Email and Networking have always been on the rise- and lately multimedia content has exploded- computers are becoming the stand alone infotainment centers of everyday people. Not to mention the myriad portable chargeable devices (Kindle 2 anyone?)

That brings me to a few questions for you:

Do you know that you use the internet – you are using energy at two levels- one powering up your computer- and the other- using the server side resources- that is the resources used in powering up the servers. That’s twin sources of  carbon footprint.

Your Answer- I know that

OK Second question: How many times do you search on an average- in a day?

Your answer: Erm..Maybe like 20 times

Third question: What’s your carbon footprint when you conduct just two searches on Google?

Your answer: Duh?

Here’s the real answer: Two search requests on the internet website Google produce “as much carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle”. That’s about 14g of CO2!

A recent report from BBC mentions many sources that have similar claims. Like the Gartner study that claims that IT now causes two percent of global emissions.

Specially activities like search- that have to rely on multiple servers to get faster results- do end up leaving a larger footprint.

Surely enough- Google disputes the study. It has traditionally been a very conscious company and they claim that efforts are already in place to identify and mitigate. Here’s a cool response from them:

“In 2007, we co-founded the Climate Savers Computing Initiative. This non-profit consortium is committed to cutting the energy consumed by computers in half by 2010 and so reducing global CO2 emissions by 54 million tons per year. That’s a lot of kettles.”

But the point is that with all aspects of our life becoming digital, there are times when we need to sit back and have some energy off-time. Or take some simple measures I guess.

I run another blog on natural lifestyle- on a site that I set up some half a decade back. One of the most popular topics have been two posts about “Top 5 analogue things to do- Part 1 and Part 2” – which is in the spirit of this post. Check the posts out. Maybe I could have put this post there.

Which means there is a lot of uptake on this topic with the eco-conscious generation of today.

At my end- I recently did this experiment- I turned down my computer screen brightness by one point and set the screensaver to be on within 2 minutes. I will also be more educated on knowing how to use search better. So I can get better results in lesser searches.

Till now- it works. My battery life has improved a good deal and I get better search results- faster!

And if it has worked for me, it will work for you as well. Nothing complicated- simple stuff should do.

Happy Saving Earth.

Thumbnail courtsey: http://www.flickr.com/photos/psd/2731067095/